From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Nov 26 10:40:14 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from diarmadhi.mushhaven.net (diarmadhi.mushhaven.net [63.75.111.197])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B2B1520E
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:39:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mistwolf@diarmadhi.mushhaven.net)
Received: (from mistwolf@localhost)
	by diarmadhi.mushhaven.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA08311;
	Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:37:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mistwolf)
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:37:22 -0800
From: Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net>
To: Matthias Buelow <token@wuff.mayn.de>
Cc: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>,
	Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4...
Message-ID: <19991126103722.A8292@mushhaven.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.9911251001220.27351-100000@tricord.system.pl> <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> <19991126121732.B27425@wuff.mayn.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
In-Reply-To: <19991126121732.B27425@wuff.mayn.de>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:17:32PM +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> 
> > -current (all the latest greatest experimental).
> > -stable (all the latest gretest "Stable" stuff).
> > -missioncritical (conservative release, once a year or so - only bug
> >fixes after release).
> 
> Hmm... wouldn't that degrade -stable and disqualify it for applications
> that are mission critical and for which it would be well suited?
> People would probably be very confused and ask why something that
> isn't mission critical is tagged "stable".

I thought that was what -release was, bugfixes and security issues only?


Jamie

> 
> mkb


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message