From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 06:03:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE9C106566B; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from cricket.hamla.org (cricket.hamla.org [206.251.255.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6358FC1D; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magic.hamla.org (cpe-68-174-92-20.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.92.20]) by cricket.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 169628A054; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:03:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:03:04 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Message-ID: <20120220060303.GA7722@magic.hamla.org> References: <201202182356.q1INuU7V061378@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org> <20120219150943.GA6673@magic.hamla.org> <20120219164528.GA48166@FreeBSD.org> <20120219175645.GA6833@magic.hamla.org> <20120219191106.GA71541@FreeBSD.org> <20120219203937.GA6943@magic.hamla.org> <20120220012336.GA41983@FreeBSD.org> <20120220024754.GB7587@magic.hamla.org> <20120220041449.GA65665@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120220041449.GA65665@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at cricket.hamla.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:03:08 -0000 On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 04:14:49 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > ... > Right, sorry I didn't catch the point originally from mi@. I was > viewing the issue from a limited angle. Doug pointed out exact > deficiency in my thinking and provided real scenario when it can be a > bummer (that is, if one wants to hold shlib dependency while being > able to chase updates of the leaf ports). Hm, I guess you missed mi@'s mention of such a scenario a few days ago, in the very same thread that I noted earlier in this discussion: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073262.html -- Sahil Tandon