From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Nov 13 19:45:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B22B37B479; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from beppo (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00027; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:45:30 -0800 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:45:29 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Mike Smith Cc: Andrew Gallatin , wkb@freebie.demon.nl, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Test success for AS2100 and AS1000A In-Reply-To: <200011140113.eAE1DoF01168@mass.osd.bsdi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > Possibly not. It's getting time for them to do so. I've had it on my list for > > > a while to do if_wx as a sample for Bill Paul and others to think about. > > > > An example would certainly be helpful. Some sort of sgmap_mbuf() (or > > whatever NetBSD's interface is would be very helpful). > > I've talked with Bill Paul about this quite a bit; the real blocking > factor is just the lack of a decent interface for s/g mapping mbufs, > especially one that deals well with alignment issues. Yes, it'd be nice to use, as NetBSD has, a map_mbuf_chain, type function, but you can indeed manually follow the chain and make this happen. Possibly we'll do an mbuf mapper- that would indeed be least invasive. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message