From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 16:01:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0C4106566C for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from det135@psu.edu) Received: from f05n03.cac.psu.edu (f05s03.cac.psu.edu [128.118.141.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990468FC15 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from det135@psu.edu) Received: from hoenikker.aset.psu.edu (hoenikker.aset.psu.edu [128.118.99.49]) by f05n03.cac.psu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id m8NAaL6s114778; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:36:22 -0400 Received: from hoenikker.aset.psu.edu (hoenikker.aset.psu.edu [128.118.99.49]) by hoenikker.aset.psu.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8NAaL0I064554; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:36:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from det135@hoenikker.aset.psu.edu) Received: (from det135@localhost) by hoenikker.aset.psu.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m8NAaLTx064553; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:36:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from det135) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:36:21 -0400 From: Derek Taylor To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080923103621.GG6930@psu.edu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <15F15FD1-3C53-4018-8792-BC63289DC4C2@netconsonance.com> <448wtpcikb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <34C3D54B-C88C-4C36-B1FE-C07FC27F8CB5@netconsonance.com> <48D596AD.1070209@bgp4.net> <7FC02881-91A6-4A2B-B58F-A4D1671B9978@netconsonance.com> <20080923163556.H76357@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080923163556.H76357@sola.nimnet.asn.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases Schedule... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Derek Taylor List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:01:40 -0000 On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Ian Smith wrote: >On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Jo Rhett wrote: > > I think you are using "last release" in a different way. "the last release" > > is always the most release release. Right now 6.3 will have support for > > longer than 6.4 will, which is the nature of the problem I raised. If you > > always supported the most recent release for 24 months then we wouldn't have > > any problem. > >Jo, it seems to be you who are trying to use "last" in an unusual way. >The "last release on a branch" is not the latest one, but the last one. >For 4.x that was .11 and for 5.x it was .5, where last means just that. Let's stop using the word "last" for the time being and instead circumvent the ambiguity via "previous" and "final", perhaps? Maybe if official documentation were updated to avoid this same ambiguity there'd be less misunderstanding too. -Derek.