From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 13:54:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D18F106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 677678FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2011 13:54:01 -0000 Received: from adsl-164.91.140.74.tellas.gr (EHLO [192.168.73.192]) [91.140.74.164] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu004) with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 15:54:01 +0200 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/BNOkr7IXBaK+ePa0G9tqA7+LDVOKE1ycPBPnt/w ZT0PUw8p0/8qDp Message-ID: <4EA2CAF0.3070600@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:53:52 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Bethke References: <76ADAE81-7725-4139-86D9-D1A9E50E5B56@lassitu.de> <4EA1FE05.9040304@gmx.com> <4EA2B15A.3020509@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4EA2B15A.3020509@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Morgan Reed , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Accessing tun devices from inside a Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:54:04 -0000 On 10/22/2011 3:04 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 22/10/2011 12:49, Stefan Bethke wrote: >> Am 22.10.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Nikos Vassiliadis: >> >>>> On 10/21/2011 5:08 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote: >>>>>> - VIMAGE and mpd don't like each other, so VIMAGE was out as well >>>> >>>> Could you explain please? In my limited testing they seem to get along fine:) >> Sorry, I misremembered. The issue is actually pf and VIMAGE. A couple of years back, there were issues with VIMAGE and netgraph, but those seem to have been resolved. > > pf and VIMAGE seems to have been fixed in 9.0 No, it's not ready yet, but the version of pf in 9.0 is VIMAGE compatible and I *think* is mostly usable in a single-instance scenario. For more than one pf instance, I am using two patches which are in GNATS if you want to try them. Nikos