Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:55:05 -0400
From:      "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
To:        Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Do we need chinese/joe (Re: svn commit: r382116 - in head/editors/joe: . files)
Message-ID:  <55157D59.3040904@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <55157285.8040104@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201503241619.t2OGJH0Q052577@svn.freebsd.org> <55157285.8040104@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27.03.2015 11:08, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> This broke chinese/joe
Indeed, sorry about that. The fix is easy, but I wonder, why chinese/joe
exists in the first place -- the sole difference between it and
editors/joe is /two lines/ in the installed etc/rjoerc file. That is
all, the port's additional patch:

    http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/local-distfiles/chinsan/patch/zh-joe-3.7.diff

achieves... Maybe, we can eliminate the additional port?

    -mi




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55157D59.3040904>