Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 02:32:25 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh Message-ID: <20130528023225.56f6fce3@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <51A3F3F8.4030505@marino.st> References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <20130527140609.3d3b9d23@gumby.homeunix.com> <444ndofstn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20130527153440.020ab20e@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3798C.9000004@marino.st> <20130527173633.0e196a08@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A38D87.8070102@marino.st> <20130527183620.5ff9d8b0@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3A813.1060908@marino.st> <20130527210924.36432f32@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3C331.901@marino.st> <20130528000505.6c506b1a@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3E8A7.7030106@marino.st> <20130528004823.71bd739a@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3F3F8.4030505@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 May 2013 02:02:00 +0200 John Marino wrote: > On 5/28/2013 01:48, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 28 May 2013 01:13:43 +0200 > >> No. That's not what those words mean. > >> Please stop assuming that somebody builds Vim repeatedly and start > >> assuming it's built for the very first time. > > > > Why wouldn't I? Are you seriously suggesting that it's the norm to > 2. Every software built from source is built "the first time" on each > server. That's not the same as first time, you do have access to other distfile directories. This is what I suspected from the start, that this is almost completely about laziness.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130528023225.56f6fce3>