From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 25 17:30:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309B0819 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no) Received: from smtp.getmail.no (smtp.getmail.no [84.208.15.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D431AA4C for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:30:45 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Received: from get-mta-scan01.get.basefarm.net ([10.5.16.4]) by get-mta-out02.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0MIS00KY6DZ2DQ40@get-mta-out02.get.basefarm.net> for freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:30:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from get-mta-scan01.get.basefarm.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 43C30179BB68_12B9FBEB for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:30:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kg-v2.kg4.no (cm-84.215.134.159.getinternet.no [84.215.134.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by get-mta-scan01.get.basefarm.net (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTPSA id 0725A17A074B_12B9FBEF for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:30:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:30:37 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel address space and auto-sizing Message-id: <20130225183037.2715baa49623db59db2fae91@getmail.no> In-reply-to: <512AAB65.1000402@rice.edu> References: <512AAB65.1000402@rice.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:30:46 -0000 On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:08:05 -0600 Alan Cox wrote: > architectures. This review turned up a couple of odd things on the AIM > platform: Is it really called the "AIM platform"? Was it ever? I've heard about the AIM Alliance[1], but never about the "AIM platform". Shouldn't it be called PReP or CHRP instead? Try googling "AIM platform", and see for yourself. References: 1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM_alliance -- Torfinn Ingolfsen