From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun  3 10:48:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA12004
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 10:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pcpsj.pfcs.com (LuGVY8WJLZsagUXZqzvb0FsO7sZoXOm9@harlan.fred.net [205.252.219.31])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA11980
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 10:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mumps.pfcs.com (mumps.pfcs.com [192.52.69.11]) by pcpsj.pfcs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA02236; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 13:47:56 -0400
Received: from localhost by mumps.pfcs.com with SMTP id AA27740
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Tue, 3 Jun 1997 13:47:55 -0400
To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Improvements to rc.firewall? 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jun 1997 19:38:47 +1000."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.970602193802.3844A-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> 
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 13:47:52 -0300
Message-Id: <27736.865360072@mumps.pfcs.com>
From: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

H> I checked this out by doing a tcpdump of my ppp link, and looked at
H> all of the DNS traffic.  Responses to my queries came in to *my* port
H> 53.

dOc> Are you running your own named locally?  That would be why.
 
Yes, I am.  Thanks for the explanation.

Perhaps we should explain that of somebody wants a working firewall
they'll have to run a local (caching or forwarding only, even)
nameserver, too.

H