From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Jul 11 18:30:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDA715DAC5D for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from samm@net-art.cz) Received: from zebra.net-art.cz (smtp-out.net-art.cz [IPv6:2001:1468::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "zebra.net-art.cz", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61FBE8BB9D; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from samm@net-art.cz) Received: by zebra.net-art.cz (Postfix, from userid 65534) id A7BAB32E00; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:29:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=net-art.cz; s=netart; t=1562869798; bh=rfZ5O7HfCmERiFlMikyEkqNO5Kzjzn9k2rmCSCODzWI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=u9ijqHBWEZwEh6aXcB/fM11ltxMEQ1Yjxwm1AqyAW6TWJJlMxxH5gRwW/ilo8WKgr Ldo6MY05TuyGDtI/LQCoZMz3xO2nJlSvGP3C8GmljAIFvzHu8ITkOY3BOw2btsC1JN 62VdSPyLZ3TLE92NU08b4GHiJMozuYGssjDWNnDrXr3IHcfE9keS0Jr/NFPL/hqkBy SB8AmR6i+8scP/8iyv3Vw8nASMIZ8J8lV0J6X2J+efkg4yo6RZa5/Qh6d2wvLZpnlx k1Zj1woItJrYxXwgZT95bxUPaUOj83CQ866PYs+ODU1tUCmpgRVOrxSR0E0Z6eqUlZ Lg1DhFwASMRxw== X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on zebra.dc.rinet.ru X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=10.0 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 Reported 0 times. [188.130.248.80] [5 zebra.net-art.cz., 1000 coolmx.net-art.cz.] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from owl.net-art.cz (surikat.net-art.cz [185.82.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "owl.net-art.cz", Issuer "owl.net-art.cz" (verified OK)) by zebra.net-art.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13DD832DFE; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:29:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [2001:1a48:6:10:a8:d857:2c96:3c9] (account samm@net-art.cz HELO Administrators-MacBook-Pro.local) by owl.net-art.cz (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.20) with ESMTPSA id 164928; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:29:55 +0200 Subject: Re: Few of my articles about FreeBSD on ARM To: Ian Lepore , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: From: Alex Samorukov Message-ID: <94eaa9c9-f826-b039-30c5-9161d163131a@net-art.cz> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:29:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with clamdscan / ClamAV 0.101.1/25507/Thu Jul 11 10:05:54 2019 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:30:04 -0000 On 11/07/2019 18:20, Ian Lepore wrote: > >> Feedback is welcome ) >> >> > Interesting articles, thanks. > > I wonder if the rpi uboot usb fix needs to find its way back upstream? Thank you for reply. Not sure if i really fixed a root cause here - my changes are in generic usb code and it could be that timing is wrong somewhere in chipset specific. But probably its good idea to report this to upstream anyway. > > For the busybox stuff... are you aware of bsdbox? I don't know much > about it, except that it existw. > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/tree/master/tools/bsdbox Looks interesting, but seems to be abandoned long time ago. There is also toybox, which is a busybox-like but with a better license. Busybox seems to be most active and commonly used in the Linux/embedded projects, thats why i started with it. I will try to submit my patches to upstream after finishing them. > > And for the dht11... we now have a generic one-wire driver in dev/ow. > I don't know anything about it myself, but I know it's being actively > maintained. Thanks for pointing it out, however, i think that DHT11 and DHT25 are using different protocol, much simpler, so not really relevant here.