From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Nov 22 17:18:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA01738
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 17:18:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pat.idt.unit.no (pat.idt.unit.no [129.241.103.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA01733
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 17:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from idt.unit.no (vier.idt.unit.no [129.241.104.3]) by pat.idt.unit.no (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA23053; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:14:45 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199611230114.CAA23053@pat.idt.unit.no>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cdrom boot? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Nov 1996 17:29:51 MST."
             <199611230029.RAA16302@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:14:45 +0100
From: "Arne H. Juul" <Arne.Juul@idt.ntnu.no>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On 22 Nov 17:29, Terry Lambert writes:
 > Is it *currently* accompanied by unprotoize(1)?
 > 
 > % man 1 unprotoize
 > No entry for unprotoize in section 1 of the manual

This tells you nothing.

$ ls /usr/src/contrib/gcc/*proto*
[...and other files...]
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/protoize.c         /usr/src/contrib/gcc/unprotoize.c

Documentation is in texinfo format, as should be expected.
In a standard gcc install, you would get the unprotoize program.
The fact that FreeBSD does not should be counted as a bug.

  -  Arne H. J.