From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 29 13:29:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA25073 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mercury.uniserve.com (mercury.uniserve.com [204.191.197.248]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA25067; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by mercury.uniserve.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA10373; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:25:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:32:02 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Warner Losh cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic0: problems? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Warner Losh wrote: > Has anybody successfully booted on a system that has an aic0 in > 2.1.5R? Yes, an Adaptec 1510 > I tried it on a frankenstein here, and discovered that it paniced for > historical reasons :-). > > aic at line xxxx: SCSI-FIFO didn't drain. > panic: for historical reasons > > Has anybody seen this? We double checked to make sure that the aic > card was at 0x340 irq 11 with the easy scsi 152x config program. When > we moved this to irq12, the panic went away, but it didn't find > anything on the bus either :-(. > > Comments? The aic driver is very poor (and very slow), and should probably be avoided. > Warner > > Tom