From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 15 16:26:03 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3F3D48
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:26:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6559D1F59
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE691.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [217.251.230.145]) (authenticated bits=128)
 by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBFGPqi2058794
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:25:52 GMT
 (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
 by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rBFGPjWO023031
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:25:45 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1])
 by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBFGPdWa037170
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:25:45 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net)
Message-Id: <201312151625.rBFGPdWa037170@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-RC1 ISO image too big 
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 15 Dec 2013 11:24:33 +0100."
 <20131215102433.GY13385@equilibrium.bsdes.net> 
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:25:39 +0100
Sender: jhs@berklix.com
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:26:03 -0000

> The whole point of the mail was just to point out this regression before
> 10 it's released.

Yes. release/Makefile could also catch it automaticaly with filesize,
so it could not bite again (happened a few times over the years I
recall, not on releases but earlier).


PS Shane wrote
> Any reason you need cd media?

Apart from other replies (eg Lots of legacy PCs with just CD drives)
I also wonder if CDs might be more reliable as lower density ?

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
 Interleave replies below like a play script.  Indent old text with "> ".
 Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
 Mailbox overflow 2013_12_10_21:00 - 2013_12_11_11:00 GMT.  No reply: Resend.