Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 08:49:27 +0000 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org, emacs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 9b5f5ab8482f - main - Mk/bsd.gcc.mk: Remove support for USE_GCC=X+ Message-ID: <0100018595b86412-0647c74d-33d0-4c76-b7c4-d337af8507f2-000000@email.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <6a9f1ae0-2185-3a04-58d7-60d141535287@pfeifer.com> References: <202301090035.3090ZRGU092147@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <01000185943f90eb-9e018e54-2c1c-4b6c-8943-c8954c3c2d82-000000@email.amazonses.com> <86sfgkpg16.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <6a9f1ae0-2185-3a04-58d7-60d141535287@pfeifer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/9/23 00:28, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023, Joseph Mingrone wrote: >>>> At this point most ports that employ USE_GCC have the USE_GCC=yes >>>> form, some have USE_GCC=X (where X is an older version of GCC than >>>> the current default), and none is left with USE_GCC=X+. >>> make_index: /usr/ports/editors/emacs-devel: no entry for /usr/ports/lang/gcc11+ > > In addition to my regular pattern searching I did actually run `make > index` to be on the safe side. Do you have an idea why this did not > trigger (when NATIVECOMP is in OPTIONS_DEFAULT of xemacs-devel)? No idea. If you run `make describe` in the port directory do you see "lang/gcc11+" showing up? It does for me. -- Colin Percival FreeBSD Deputy Release Engineer & EC2 platform maintainer Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0100018595b86412-0647c74d-33d0-4c76-b7c4-d337af8507f2-000000>