From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 05:42:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EBF16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:42:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail28.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail28.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DF943D48 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:42:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) j1K5gqGv019621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:42:52 +1100 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])j1K5gp7l082928 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:42:51 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id j1K5gpLO082927 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:42:51 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:42:51 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050220054251.GB28983@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Signalling a process from a INTR_FAST handler X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:42:55 -0000 I have a hardware interrupt handler that has to forward a signal to userland and that I'd like to mark INTR_FAST. AFAIK, the normal way to forward a signal is: if ((p = pfind(sc->pid_to_signal)) != NULL) { psignal(p, SIGUSR2); PROC_UNLOCK(p); } But pfind(9) does a PROC_LOCK() which implies it can sleep and therefore can't be used by an INTR_FAST handler. Firstly, am I correct? If so, is there an alternative approach I can use? -- Peter Jeremy