From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 14 11:37:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA26249 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 14 Jul 1996 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA26244 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 1996 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA15041; Sun, 14 Jul 1996 12:36:50 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 12:36:50 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199607141836.MAA15041@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: Sean Eric Fagan Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "login classes" In-Reply-To: <199607141649.JAA11161@kithrup.com> References: <199607141649.JAA11161@kithrup.com> Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > At the basest, it is not a whole lot more than "allowing you to use seperate > authentication." [ rest of description deleted ] ... Thanks, that's a much better explanation. It sounds like it could be very useful, and I hope someone comes up with some utils. that actually *USE* it once it's implemented. I would use it for setting up login/SLIP/PPP accounts on my box, which now have *3* accounts. :( Nate