From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 26 19:12:55 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09343106567A;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:12:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:12:45 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <AANLkTi=TM8qfSZLmmX_tFmdhd6D3w-=tjZ99kKK_Cw4K@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.GSO.1.10.1103312155570.19944@multics.mit.edu>
	<alpine.GSO.1.10.1104231605220.17169@multics.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1104231605220.17169@multics.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201104261512.46925.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: nspluginwrapper (was: Re: Wow... (<-- blown away at
	performance))
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:12:55 -0000

On Saturday 23 April 2011 04:11 pm, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> On Thursday 31 March 2011 02:27 pm, Alexander Best wrote:
> >>> i just noticed the WWW links in pkg-descr of boths
> >>> nspluginwrapper and nspluginwrapper-devel are broken. i believe
> >>> [1] is the current location.
> >>>
> >>> cheers.
> >>> alex
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://github.com/davidben/nspluginwrapper
> >>
> >> No, this is actually a fork.  The original author disappeared
> >> and this guy picked it up from the last snapshot release. 
> >> Please note there was no official release from this tree yet. 
> >> If this guy actually produces something useful,
> >> www/nspluginwrapper-devel may switch later, of course.
> >
> > Yes, this is a fork, but he is serious about cleaning up the code
> > and is planning to become the new upstream.  He was actually just
> > in the office here this afternoon commenting how introducing a
> > feature to configure that causes unknown options to be errors
> > would cause most distros' packaging to break. Please do continue
> > to follow it, as I expect it will come to fruition.
>
> Replying to this old thread, David tells me he has rolled a
> release, and has gained the old maintainer's blessing:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/nspluginwrapper-devel-list/2011-Apri
>l/msg00006.html
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/nspluginwrapper-devel-list/2011-Apri
>l/msg00003.html

www/nspluginwrapper-devel is updated to 1.3.2.

Cheers,

Jung-uk Kim