From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 7 07:11:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80AB106566C; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5C98FC08; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p677Bckc071604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:11:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p677BcDO071603; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA23084; Thu, 7 Jul 11 00:04:54 PDT Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:05:41 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Message-Id: <4e15bd35.r2TPH7JSMoyDg2ic%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4E1421D9.7080808@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E147F54.40908@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110706193636.GA69550@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4E14CCE5.4050906@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110707015151.GB71966@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110707031151.GA72452@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110707031151.GA72452@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:16:41 +0000 Cc: adrian@freebsd.org, 6yearold@gmail.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, lacombar@gmail.com, ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:11:43 -0000 Steve Kargl wrote: > Let's face, ULE is not a silver bullet. Or perhaps it is, but this particular problem is so heavily armored as to demand depleted uranium :)