Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 10:36:42 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree Message-ID: <20040601063642.GD69572@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bosko, On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Bosko Milekic wrote: B> In order to avoid having to type everything again, I'll refer B> to the commit log. PLEASE READ IT IN FULL: B> B> Bring in mbuma to replace mballoc. B> B> mbuma is an Mbuf & Cluster allocator built on top of a number of B> extensions to the UMA framework, all included herein. Have you done any performance tests? How this new allocator affects network performance? How stable is it? :) Yesterday I was planning to upgrade CURRENT on my production router. Should I do it? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040601063642.GD69572>