From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Dec  4 17:55:07 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id RAA00167
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eel.dataplex.net (eel.dataplex.net [208.2.87.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA00162
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod [208.2.87.4])
          by eel.dataplex.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA17171;
          Wed, 4 Dec 1996 19:55:01 -0600 (CST)
X-Sender: rkw@mail.dataplex.net
Message-Id: <l03010900aecbd8d5fc0e@[208.2.87.4]>
In-Reply-To: <199612050106.SAA12859@rocky.mt.sri.com>
References: <199612050054.QAA02606@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> <nate@mt.sri.com>
 <199612050054.QAA02606@salsa.gv.ssi1.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 19:44:49 -0600
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions...
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com wrote:
>> I'll agree that it's dead as far as new development, but I'll have it
>> running here for quite a while yet.  I'd like to see security patches
>> released as needed.
>How would they be distributed?

CTM works quite well. And it is an automated distribution.
CVSup also works and will continue to do so until someone removes some
critical part of the CVS tree.