From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Nov 10 19:07:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9ED5A2C172 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D55151296 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tAAJ7ktC039945 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:07:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204121] numa(4) is broken Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:07:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: adrian@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:07:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 Adrian Chadd changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #7 from Adrian Chadd --- ok, I bet my first-touch iterator is biting me. It doesn't skip over the first-touch domain, so it's possible that you've hit a situation where the domain 'n' fails allocation, and the per-thread round-robin domain value is also 'n'. We'll just have to fix the round-robin iterator routine to take a domain to 'skip' over (and have it ensure that it isn't just a single domain (0) and thus gets stuck skipping over that. :-) I don't have any NUMA boxes handy atm but I'll try to come up with a patch to test. Thanks! -a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.