From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Sep 26 21:30: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D0C37B423 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id VAA85600; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200009270430.VAA85600@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Makoto MATSUSHITA Subject: Re: kern/21405: PATCH: Default module patch mismatch between kernel and loader(8) Reply-To: Makoto MATSUSHITA Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/21405; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Makoto MATSUSHITA To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/21405: PATCH: Default module patch mismatch between kernel and loader(8) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:23:38 +0900 Here is a status of this PR. * Just submitted, no one checked. * There are yet another way of thinking. If you want to install a *new* version of kernel module which is also available by FreeBSD itself, /boot/modules should be listed *before* of /boot/kernel. So, maybe current kernel implementation is not wrong, and loader.conf needs modification. Anyway, is there anybody to analyse this PR ? -- - Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message