From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Jul 20 9:30:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.85]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9295937B403 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from mindspring.com (dialup-209.245.134.204.Dial1.SanJose1.Level3.net [209.245.134.204]) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA21735; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B585CC8.480BA14D@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:31:04 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Reply-To: tlambert2@mindspring.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: j mckitrick Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysadminmag update References: <20010720030757.A7504@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG j mckitrick wrote: > > So, after all this tweaking, > "we found that FreeBSD > tuned had very similar performance to Linux > (untuned) when running 1000 or less simultaneous > sends. Overall, the tuned version of FreeBSD was > 27% faster at sending email than the untuned > version. FreeBSD mail sending performance peaked > at 1000 to 1500 simultaneous sends, and then > steadily declined as simultaneous connections > increased." > > does this matter? Pointer to article, please... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message