Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 12:49:42 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: "swap" partition leads to instability? Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK2oBCp8rfm9RWDt0aPKUyT%2Br6VFV2mOO9DepGaK8nDvGg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <loom.20130529T131753-79@post.gmane.org> References: <1369558712.96152.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <loom.20130526T143506-872@post.gmane.org> <1369644392.92027.YahooMailNeo@web165003.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <loom.20130527T115233-867@post.gmane.org> <loom.20130528T204022-196@post.gmane.org> <CAH3a3KU%2BZe2SRe0DQVGw=rV1XhCL1z4mZu2Mdv_c_NnAD9pyAw@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20130529T131753-79@post.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:19 AM, jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com> wrote: > - overcommitment of memory (a bluff asking to be punished by OOM killer) No self respecting Unix has an OOM by default. > - OOM killer Are you suggesting FreeBSD does this crap? > Besides, they allow sloppy/dangerous programming. Yup, in the kernel. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2oBCp8rfm9RWDt0aPKUyT%2Br6VFV2mOO9DepGaK8nDvGg>