From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jun 29 16:29:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from smtp4.hushmail.com (smtp4.hushmail.com [64.40.111.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B797D37B403 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:29:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from appleseed@hushmail.com) Received: from user7.hushmail.com (user7.hushmail.com [64.40.111.47]) by smtp4.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109DD2F97; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by user7.hushmail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA18193; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:29:18 -0700 From: appleseed@hushmail.com Message-Id: <200106292329.QAA18193@user7.hushmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:29:52 -0500 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG To: Peter Pentchev Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Hushpart_boundary_saCIrLnOYCavFxdulvzcMGcmEXkwVrkM" Subject: Re: What is ipfw telling me ? Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --Hushpart_boundary_saCIrLnOYCavFxdulvzcMGcmEXkwVrkM Content-type: text/plain >In some respects, probably. Your statement, though, seemed to imply >that ipfw was not able of keeping track of state, and ipf was. >That's what I tried to correct. Nah, I knew what u meant. I was just messing with u ;-). Ipf is just my personal preference. northern_ Free, encrypted, secure Web-based email at www.hushmail.com --Hushpart_boundary_saCIrLnOYCavFxdulvzcMGcmEXkwVrkM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message