Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:07:02 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-15?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame Message-ID: <200401130107.08427@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <22741.1073889204@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <22741.1073889204@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_sazAAfmPZENjFQB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 12 January 2004 07:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <xzphdz2qicf.fsf@dwp.des.no>, Dag-Erling > =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= > > writes: > >"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > >> Maybe this would be a good test-case for seeing how well it works? > >> Maybe not. We do need to run a few more test-cases for things through > >> this scenario... I'm not sure this one is well suited to it. > > > >If we toss out Vinum, there's a significant risk that 5.3 will ship > >without RAID support at all. I'm pretty certain we don't want that. Just my opinion: That's way worse than having no software RAID! No qualified explanations, just a opinion. -Harry > > If we don't do something drastic, there's a significant risk that > 5.3 and all future releases will ship with partially broken RAID > support. I'm pretty certain we don't want that either. --Boundary-02=_sazAAfmPZENjFQB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAAzasBylq0S4AzzwRAmaQAJ9Br/6xooc7eXBdbjVQjTZRdb/MigCghE// OC+tyY+cMoHUGH0N4SGnFNg= =G6i+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_sazAAfmPZENjFQB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401130107.08427>