From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Dec 16 07:45:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40763EA0179; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 07:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20BBF7B543; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 07:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 729C737D7; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 07:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 07:45:12 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Linimon Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456402 - in head/lang/ocaml: . files Message-ID: <20171216074512.GB4791@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712151531.vBFFV86t045131@repo.freebsd.org> <20171215170122.GA55820@FreeBSD.org> <20171215191612.GA13818@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171215191612.GA13818@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 07:45:13 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 01:16:12PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:01:22PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I don't know why as(1), as /usr/bin/as typically, is not installed on > > ref11-aarch64.freebsd.org. > > Perhaps the Makefile patch from the following will be instructive: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221901 Yes, that's what first comes to mind, but I want to understand first why there is not as(1) on some targets in the first placed, while it is installed on clangish i386/amd64. > which were patches from strejda which the maintainer never responded > to IIUC. > > It appears that the proposed arch changes to the patch-configure file > in that PR are OBE*, but I don't think that the other lines are. patch-configure is incorrectly generated in that PR, please don't commit it. Let's see if I can sort out arm* building problems in next couple of days first. ./danfe