From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 2 17:39:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA28045 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 17:39:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.1.39.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA28037 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 17:39:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Message-Id: <199901030139.RAA28037@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA094417545; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 20:39:05 -0500 Subject: Are PAO patches needed fro 3.0? To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG (Free BSD Questions list) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 20:39:04 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am geting a new laptop shorlty. will be either a Toshiba, or an HP. I want to install 3.0 on it. Will I need PAO patches, or are the blended in? -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message