From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 15 18:14:06 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA22271 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 18:14:06 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA22258 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 18:14:01 -0700 Received: (from jkh@localhost) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id SAA12444 for hackers@freefall; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 18:11:49 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 18:11:49 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Message-Id: <199509160111.SAA12444@time.cdrom.com> To: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: iostat and lp0 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Shouldn't iostat report parallel port I/O? It's kind of hard otherwise to measure performance and load with the lp0 network device..