From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 11 01:21:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA10343 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 01:21:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA10319 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 01:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id BAA01606; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 01:20:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 01:20:14 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: stevel cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Xfree86 3.2A Beta In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, stevel wrote: > In the Xfree86 FAQ (BETA section) is says that they will release their > next beta (3.2A) towards the end of Feb. Is this something appropriate to > include in 2.2R? When this does come out, and it is packaged up, will it > have been compiled so as to be able to install/run on 2.2R if it isn't > included? FreeBSD only packages XFree86 releases with our releases. You are of course welcome to pull and run other XFree developments yourself -- they do build FreeBSD binaries. I ran the 3.1.2 beta Xservers so my Mach64 would work properly, with no problems. I would not run them uless you were having a problem, though. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major