Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:03:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyAyMjkxMDldIGNvbmZpZy1yZWN1cnNpdmUgdGFyZ2V0IGJy?= =?UTF-8?B?b2tlbiDigJMgbW9zdCBsaWtlbHkgZHVlIHRvIE9QVElPTl8gY2hhbmdlcw==?= Message-ID: <bug-229109-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229109 Bug ID: 229109 Summary: config-recursive target broken =E2=80=93 most likely du= e to OPTION_ changes Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de The config-recursive target doesn't work correctly anymore. It recurses also dependencies, which were unset/excluded/siwtched off by OPTIONS framework. Some time ago, OPTIONS worked very well. No idea why someone changed it and introduced OPTION_ makros, I don't see any benefit anywhere over the previo= us usage. I would like to know if this is going to change again in the near future or= if it's worth to look at config-recursive: and try to fix. Meanwhile I'll live with unnecessarily spammed db/ports/ directory, making = live harder if one likes to keep overview :-( -harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-229109-7788>