From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 2 14:30:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06697 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:30:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl (smtp1.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.51]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA06692 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:30:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from asterix.xs4all.nl (root@asterix.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.11]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.7.6/XS4ALL) with ESMTP id XAA11545 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 23:29:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from plm.xs4all.nl (uucp@localhost) by asterix.xs4all.nl (8.7.5/8.7.2) with UUCP id XAA09422 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 23:22:34 +0100 (MET) Received: (from plm@localhost) by plm.xs4all.nl (8.8.4/8.7.3) id LAA16106; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 11:14:07 +0100 (MET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Lite-2 question From: Peter Mutsaers Date: 02 Mar 1997 11:14:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87pvxi38k0.fsf@plm.xs4all.nl> Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Could someone tell me what the Lite-2 merges bring? Does it for example mean that things like the union FS or LFS will work? Or are there other improvements? I'm doubting what I should do: Use 3.0-current (but wait a while until the Lite-2 merge has stabilized a bit) or use 2.2 (when Lite-2's improvements are not of great use for me). Thanks, -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust is a good quality plm@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands | for other people to have