From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Aug 15 19:03:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA01791
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 19:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA01786
          for <current@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 19:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA03324;
	Fri, 15 Aug 1997 19:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708160203.TAA03324@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>
cc: current@hub.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: exmh and current.. anyone? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 16 Aug 1997 10:29:14 +1000."
             <199708160029.KAA00864@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 19:03:11 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of David Nugent :
> As someone pointed out, if the new tcl8 initialisation files were
> moved into /usr/libdata/tcl8.0/ rather than their current location,
> it would mitigate problems with any transition from 2.2 to -current
> as the existing files and libraries would remain intact. I honestly

Wrong , again the issue is not tcl8.xxx rather is what it ought
to be requirement: a resonable ability to resolve technical issues.

Yes, we need users on current however people should understand that
is a fluid environment.


	Peace and Have fun,
	Amancio