From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 12 10:52:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA05669 for current-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 10:52:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from sos.freebsd.dk (sos.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA05591; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 10:51:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@sos.freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by sos.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.7.3) id TAA16470; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 19:49:51 +0200 (MEST) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <199710121749.TAA16470@sos.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: possible sc0 problem In-Reply-To: <3398.876677916@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Oct 12, 97 10:38:36 am" To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 19:49:51 +0200 (MEST) Cc: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, rickl@ic.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote: > > Hmm, not that easy if its going to be configurable in the keymap > > UNLESS we invent a new row (hell SCO compatibility doesn't mean > > much anymore, now does it :) ) > > Certainly not if you're comparing it to current technology, no. I'm > not even sure that SCO is all that compatible with SCO anymore. :-) Yes they are, at least in the latest I've seen, nobody does anything to textmode screens anymore, they are kind of out of fashion. What I really meant, was that we now have so much momentum, that we can set our own rules here... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..