From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Oct 26 16:40:20 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A8537B434
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (12-232-206-8.client.attbi.com [12.232.206.8])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B54143E3B
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA14622;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com>
Cc: "'Kevin Stevens'" <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>,
	freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: Annoying ARP warning messages.
In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533701022D92@mail.sandvine.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210261615400.13443-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Don Bowman wrote:

> Kevin Stevens wrote:
> > I have two systems connected through a common network (switch).  They 
> > each have two NICs, with one addressed on one IP network and the second 
> > on another.  IP works fine.  My problem is that the kernel keeps 
> > bitching about seeing the same MAC addresses on both interfaces:

well, WHY is it seeing the same MA addresses on both interfaces?
Is this your attempt to get more throughput using 2 logical nets through
the same switch?  I'd fork out the extra $5 for switched cable and
connet them together directly
and bypass the switch (for teh 2nd link)
(probably faster too)


> > 
> > Oct 26 06:15:03 babelfish /kernel: arp: 192.168.168.101 is on em0 but 
> > got reply from 00:30:65:00:e6:e6 on xl0
> 
> systcl net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0
> 
> --don (don@sandvine.com www.sandvine.com p2p)
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message