From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 24 12:52:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B85637BE85 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:52:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e6OJqJI09641; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:52:19 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "SILVER, MICHAEL A" Cc: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: Re: Anyone using Samba? Message-ID: <20000724125219.V13979@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from MSILVER@scana.com on Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:58:56PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * SILVER, MICHAEL A [000724 12:51] wrote: > Is anyone using Samba in a corporate environment instead of NT, with 95/98 > or NT workstations? Any luck? Any one convert from NT to Samba? Is there > anything to watch out for? I have client who might benefit from a move to > Samba from NT 3.51. 3 words: Samba kicks butt! It's a bit tricky to configure, but it's very fast and customizable and offers nearly all the capabilities that NT does. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message