From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 22 07:09:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA16434 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 07:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from theta.pair.com (theta.pair.com [207.86.128.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA16429 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 07:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adam.netsonic.com (gb_noc48.sparknet.net [207.250.20.48]) by theta.pair.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA13569 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 10:05:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Envelope-To: Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970422091443.006ac754@mail.netsonic.com> X-Sender: adam@mail.netsonic.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 09:14:45 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Adam L. Simpson" Subject: 2.1.7 vs 2.2.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I am installing FBSD on a coupel of machines... after a great deal of frustration, we finally got 2.1.7 installed on one machine. I also have 2.2.1 and was wondering if this version is as stable or more stable than 2.1.7 and if 2.2.1 is safe to go with for a high traffice web server? In other words we are not in beta mode with that package are we? My second question is what is the optimum disk partioning scheme for a 4gb Hd. Should /usr be my largest directory without question? What is the recommended allotment for /usr and /var? Thanks for your help! Adam