From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 26 02:29:35 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6F716A4CE
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6587043D2D
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:32 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from bms@spc.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 64F5A653E6; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 27291-04-5; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (unknown [213.210.24.3])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CE9BC652FE; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 1742D62E0; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:36 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:36 +0000
From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To: cokane@cokane.org
Message-ID: <20050126022936.GI692@empiric.icir.org>
Mail-Followup-To: cokane@cokane.org,
	Avleen Vig <lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com>,
	freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Kang Liu <liukang@bjpu.edu.cn>,
	delphij@delphij.net
References: <306655831.12043@bjut.edu.cn> <306658548.02074@bjut.edu.cn>
	<20050125173852.GU19973@silverwraith.com>
	<346a8022050125104667f631be@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <346a8022050125104667f631be@mail.gmail.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: Kang Liu <liukang@bjpu.edu.cn>
cc: delphij@delphij.net
Subject: Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:35 -0000

On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
> This is only my personal opinion. I think the WITH_XXXX_OVERWITE_BASE
> make options help substantiate it, however.

I've recently updated the tcpdump port to fix a number of issues. If
people could confirm that the OVERWRITE_BASE option still works there,
I should be most grateful.

Regards,
BMS