From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 23:00:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E4416A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:00:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.homeunix.org (pcp04368961pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net [69.140.212.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065EE43D1D for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:00:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8ON0DgM001900; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:00:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8ON0COx001899; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:00:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:00:12 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: "JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H" Message-ID: <20040924230011.GA1164@green.homeunix.org> References: <20040922020957.GE84424@green.homeunix.org> <20040923185841.GD959@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPv6 route mutex recursion (crash) and fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:00:14 -0000 On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 03:40:04AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H wrote: > (resending, since the first attempt seems to have failed due to some > DNS-related error) > > >>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:58:41 -0400, > >>>>> Brian Fundakowski Feldman said: > > >> So, as a result, I tend to think the proposed patch is a reasonable > >> fix to the problem. But please add the rationale as comments, since > >> the background intent is a bit vague as shown by the question from > >> George. > > > Thank you for your review. As you certainly are more knowledgable in KAME > > code than I am, would you mind redoing this so that the style is more > > closely matched; then I could take the change from the KAME repository? > > I'm willing to help you, but please let me check to be sure. Are you > asking me to modify the KAME snap code based on your patch first, > which you'll then merge back to FreeBSD? Yes, that is the way I would prefer things to be done, but either way is fine with me. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\