From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Jul 17 01:22:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA08628 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 01:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA08619; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 01:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA00253; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 22:52:14 +0200 (MET DST) To: Steve Passe cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP-compliant motherboards In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jul 1996 14:27:35 MDT." <199607162027.OAA28431@clem.systemsix.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 22:52:13 +0200 Message-ID: <251.837550333@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>> Where are the latest SMP sources/patches kept? The stuff on freefall >>> is old (last time I checked). >> >> On Peter Wemm's machine. We need to bug him, since he has some cool >> stuff he's been threatening to commit for a while. 8-). > >Us mortals evidentally can't get to .../src on freefall. If one wanted to >start playing with the SMP stuff: yes you can, there is a sup-target for the smp stuff. What Terry hints at here, is some stuff Peter is working on to improve the startup a lot. > 1: where could the patches be gotten? sup or ctm from freefall. > 2: am I correct in believing that they could be applied to the latest > 2.2-SNAP (possibly after supping to -current)? It's a separate sys tree that lacks a little bit behind -current. > 3: is it stable enough to actually compile and run programs yet? yes, havn't had a panic for a long time (~weeks) Peter has promised me to merge this into -current RSN :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.