From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 15 17:41:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6369316A400 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cokane@mail.cokane.org) Received: from ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271EB13C471 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cokane@mail.cokane.org) Received: from ramen.cokane.org (rrcs-24-153-184-158.sw.biz.rr.com [24.153.184.158]) by ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l1FGwTpL003234 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:58:29 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 83420 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Feb 2007 16:57:57 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:57:57 +0000 From: Coleman Kane To: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: <20070215165757.GA83361@ramen.coleyandcheryl> References: <17875.18893.789217.224987@canoe.dclg.ca> <200702141255.53501.lists@jnielsen.net> <346a80220702141036j29485688gf052be8f4432eed5@mail.gmail.com> <33BBE265-A5B1-4F82-BF41-84825A7089FC@xview.net> <20070215091900.x3y2c655kwcog48k@webmail.leidinger.net> <346a80220702150826k784f6538i8a76655c745b2b5a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:56:15 +0000 Cc: Alexander Leidinger , David Gilbert , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Olivier Warin Subject: Re: portupgrade O(n^m)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:41:04 -0000 On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote, and it was proclaimed: > On 2/15/07, Coleman Kane wrote: > >On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> > >> Quoting Olivier Warin (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007 > >> 19:54:09 +0100): > >> > >> > This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port takes > >> > far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is > >> > awfull too. > >> > >> Regarding "make index": try "make fetchindex" right after the cvsup. > >> IT may not be up to the point with the cvsupped stuff, but not far off. > >> > >> Bye, > >> Alexander. > > > > > > > >I don't think we who use the modular X.org tree can do this since a number > >of the ports won't be properly registered in the file (or am I off-base > >here?). > >-- > >Coleman > > We who use the modular xorg tree cant do make fetchindex, we have to > do make index... I've never had any problem with portupgrade taking > forever to run if i've done a make index and a portsdb -u before > running. But then again, I only have somewhere around 350 ports at the > moment. > > //Niclas I have over 1000 ports installed and it can be annoyingly slow. I don't completely know if the "portupgrade" script is the 100% culprit though, as it calls a number of other programs during execution. -- coleman