From owner-freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Mon Apr 8 01:20:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA82E1570693 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 01:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic302-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic302-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B318172A for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 01:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: zR6aeIUVM1ndRmGwNYpIftPUEOZ0DEuNY.wXYxDPh0p5yuzfquOiRO5EU.tLnQ3 LFohuwYtYlRxlN_J33pKkAZ_Cma5Hucsa5VHte_81WhEOTeb.bm0eEBrQ.6bGAMM4j_BDEX5XLcu 8OdUZdwdbCp1YUPUBCDSj6VXckcTntU4t_FZCX17qde3yTgOtxbT2X32HRAbedYg5D3IdRb8njBi h58_CXs6Lmsk8yOCUYVdToFbmlPo_APHZBF7lI72fZLiTPEQiEHcUoq0hB0yzllP6MKPDWVefxiL _qzUj.rArxjSjMKGvj1ysUVvGCf45xHENT8tB9wgXHMI_ZiBkjxBOJiN0Gw6rE8V_r1DvFT0ewWA OWY4hCiZD4CX0FWyPAyuHDVnogUOVu_nzm7nlEP_B3NmLJSa0fL6FpTCxPUuRgSrbX8bus7Fz4ud nfkwF7SFyFhzKMdNqVt7g8UxUv_xZTMUkruysh.Sh8IhiD2mvsrsuzuRWbOCIjS9NJTD9N58TWIK LwILoPqHtWhT_yTa_5Osxe18xtgaJ4yGjgGV6KY7O4k57i1VAhUa3E_5SU00aoln8L64RjhGCdCt 60KArXZIPK.AwYZUOzLZNnS0M0GNGYIP02B0tFu_Eh.2xWEKo81ZQ4PtSJ_3nD9wc3uBovyCcCvK fX1Zkpq905HRAqR4cQrt_dqhEgQP0SqRU5PBg3qOpk_MgbFu2p0qO_BX6j55PWrqYO04l4gzcmu6 D1Lc2KJCPZMwVSxFBQfW1feOS1ErQGLXJlytdOlsJmTQ8N4MebiBMnS1qN1v2.biUNzCJZauaZDW NEbMDp89pPOW0_FKIdeidYeTUzh2.bpQqgsH18qtuVWSDjvMQ4kixXeH8_B8X68hE5bTxelWPX44 A5NXJsqIM89HNBra2H2SoSHfKQRM6EjUCRczL2kOk.3NyFoN2aSvu_HD48s21GlGbYSGL2td36fJ 6h_awXqdyhTUUfgHIGb0fQGlX9Ag1xsrLxaDd1D4u3vw5TJhd08cR_z8GLugn_UtzSGifvrTwSA1 90In_3dvnhm046DsMyVLReFtPkb_u0EAMpMSjgtWA74eFaBQk16oc2OhXexUIT9CXdi1QIYF5yAM y Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic302.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 01:20:30 +0000 Received: from c-76-115-7-162.hsd1.or.comcast.net (EHLO [192.168.1.103]) ([76.115.7.162]) by smtp430.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 15b062904e97ac56a89a7e27860565ea; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 01:20:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) Subject: Re: head -r345758: usefdt=1 style boot fails on PowerMac7,2 G5 (1 core per socket): Error -2 adding node /cpus/PowerpC,970 [G4 failures too, problem identified] Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 18:20:27 -0700 References: <98A19824-3C07-4ED6-A848-5A634F95E1CF@yahoo.com> <9A2F72B7-A25C-478C-B1AD-0661278F0B46@yahoo.com> To: FreeBSD PowerPC ML , Justin Hibbits In-Reply-To: <9A2F72B7-A25C-478C-B1AD-0661278F0B46@yahoo.com> Message-Id: <88C954A4-6D5A-4AB9-AA26-0ACD6D298605@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 52B318172A X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.27 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mta6.am0.yahoodns.net]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.55)[0.545,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.83)[-0.830,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.70)[ip: (1.86), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.95), asn: 36647(0.76), country: US(-0.06)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.36)[0.360,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[146.68.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 01:20:40 -0000 [I produced a ofwdump -ap output from the old SSD booting the PowerMac11,2 . It produces a (somewhat) larger output than is produced under usefdt=3D1 style handling, suggesting mismatches or incompletenesses for usefdt=3D1 .] On 2019-Apr-7, at 16:31, Mark Millard wrote: >=20 > On 2019-Apr-7, at 15:46, Mark Millard wrote: >=20 >> . . . >=20 >>=20 >> I'll see about diff'ing the good vs. bad PowerMac3,6 >> ofwdump -ap output when I have a chance. >>=20 >=20 > The outputs are not such that a diff is all that useful, > a extensively different output ordering appears to be=20 > involved. >=20 > For reference: >=20 > # ls -lTd ~/ofwdump_*.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 166008 Apr 7 16:21:33 2019 = /root/ofwdump_11,2_usefdt1.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 93713 Apr 7 13:11:21 2019 = /root/ofwdump_3,6_bad.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 162390 Apr 7 15:40:23 2019 = /root/ofwdump_3,6_good.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 818400 Apr 7 15:15:03 2019 = /root/ofwdump_7,2_good.txt >=20 > ( *3,6_bad.txt was under usefdt=3D1 and based on far more modern head = code than the > matching *3,6_good.txt file was. *7,2_good.txt is from the old version = of head as > well. ) >=20 > ofwdump_3,6_bad.txt seems to be missing a lot, based on the size = difference vs. > ofwdump_3,6_good.txt . So, showing the older context's ofwdump -ap output file size as well: # ls -lTd ~/ofwdump_*.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 192603 Apr 7 17:48:15 2019 = /root/ofwdump_11,2_old.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 166008 Apr 7 16:21:33 2019 = /root/ofwdump_11,2_usefdt1.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 93713 Apr 7 13:11:21 2019 = /root/ofwdump_3,6_bad.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 162390 Apr 7 15:40:23 2019 = /root/ofwdump_3,6_good.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 818400 Apr 7 15:15:03 2019 = /root/ofwdump_7,2_good.txt Again, the ordering differences and such make a diff not all that useful. I have no clue why ofwdump_7,2_good.txt is so much larger than all the others. It would be easier to compare old vs. usefdt=3D1 style if usefdt=3D1 = style managed to preserve the ordering of what ofwdump -ap outputs for old, = there by allowing vastly fewer differences (despite magic node number = differences and such). I've no clue how to validate the usefdt=3D1 style as things = are. I do not ever have access to other types of G5's. I do sometimes have access to some single-socket/single-processor/single-core G4s and one G3. But I'm not intending to do any exploring for these for now. Let me know if you want a bugzilla submittal with the ofwdump_*,*.txt = files as attachments. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)