From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 02:15:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2EA16A479 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF60B43D45 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 57so1105738wri for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:15:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TxRjVnALTuffSUcGImcg5LJhVyS79dOZ0ZTT974aJiqvUpnzDU3wGCEcbnKachhBClnhGI4UIQQfGfTU1i3R2hy/QUrFhYx43lu+sKS7mlBoIAZQVseviVwPoQivEYZAoCJJEZAvgdHahcct4gXJ3NqjPKVOev8H8NzSvcBWGnI= Received: by 10.54.100.7 with SMTP id x7mr5466914wrb; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?195.16.87.34? ( [195.16.87.34]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 40sm6496080wrl.2006.06.18.19.15.06; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <449608A8.3010101@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:15:04 -0500 From: Dennis Olvany User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060211) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Hoffman References: <4495F9A1.8040407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:15:11 -0000 >> ...facts are not eligible for copyright. > I'm afraid you're incorrect. The work in question is indeed copyrightable > under the Berne Convention, which many countries have ratified, including > the United States, where the content is hosted. The United States, as well > as many other countries, also have national laws which allow this work > to be > copyrighted. At best, the article may be considered a derivative work of the described software/hardware and therefore the intellectual property of the respective manufacturers.