Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:49:27 -0800 (PST)
From:      Ron Echeverri <rone@bofh.noc.best.net>
To:        stable@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: -current and -stable mailing lists
Message-ID:  <199703162349.PAA07355@bofh.noc.best.net>
In-Reply-To: <199703162206.PAA16084@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Mar 16, 97 03:06:11 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams writes:
  Where do we send bug reports and comments on 2.2 now that 2.2 is
  released?  In the past -stable was 2.1.*, and -current was
  anything/everything else.
  Inquiring minds would like to know?  Should we state that 2.2 is now
  -stable material, since I suspect it's at least as stable as the 2.1.0
  release.
  
Well, logically (well, my logic, for what that's worth), 3.0 should be
under -current and 2.2 should be under -stable.  2.1-stable should be
moved to -oldiebutgoodie or something like that.
  
rone
-- 
Ron Echeverri         Best Internet Usenet Administration         rone@best.net
 #############################################################################
                INGREDIENT:  Sodium benzoate (to preserve taste)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703162349.PAA07355>