From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Jul 12 8:20: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1056E14BF8 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA19634; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199907121520.IAA19634@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: docs/12595: [PATCH] New FAQ Entry: "Why shouldn't I just go ahead and run -current?" Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/12595; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: John Baldwin Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/12595: [PATCH] New FAQ Entry: "Why shouldn't I just go ahead and run -current?" Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:09:01 +0200 Hi John, I think we were all very impressed with Daniel's little rant. However, do you really think that adding this _to_ _the_ _FAQ_ will actually reduce the number of times this question crops up on the hackers and current mailing lists? I don't think so. I think that the only value of having this in the FAQ is so that we can give people the snotty response "Read the FAQ" when they ask. Are you sure that this is a sound motivation for adding the entry to the FAQ? This is a genuine question, I'm not just stabbing at the idea. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message