From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 16:22:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B533D99F; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E91F36; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (159.Red-79-148-64.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.148.64.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288FC43C1B; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:15:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <551EBCAB.9060803@marino.st> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:15:39 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev , Bartek Rutkowski Subject: Re: svn commit: r383138 - head/net-im/uTox References: <201504031546.t33FkDRj029242@svn.freebsd.org> <20150403160305.GA29223@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150403160305.GA29223@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:22:42 -0000 On 4/3/2015 18:03, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 03:46:13PM +0000, Bartek Rutkowski wrote: >> New Revision: 383138 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/383138 >> >> [...] >> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ USE_GITHUB= yes >> GH_ACCOUNT= notsecure >> GH_PROJECT= ${PORTNAME} >> GH_TAGNAME= ${GH_COMMIT} >> -GH_COMMIT= f24082d >> +GH_COMMIT= 15b1ad9 > > Bartek, you did read /usr/ports/CHANGES recently about GH_COMMIT (and whole > new GitHub magic), didn't you? > What's not clear to me is how long the transition phase from GITHUB_LEGACY to GITHUB is. It's implied that we should be changing these from LEGACY to the new URL, but what the ramifications if we don't? How long do we have? 1 month? 1 year? indefinitely? What's the downside of keeping the original style? I'm sure what Robak committed actually works. How long it will work, I have no idea. Maybe I missed that part. Has it been communicated? John