From nobody Tue Aug 22 09:05:11 2023 X-Original-To: pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RVNj40hD7z4qc1V for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RVNj34xJNz4sZ4 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1692695111; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Brj7s95Mw2Oxc+P1SORe6MN8dHfkdQ5a2Icx1Jm7c6s=; b=EXnoQj6aXc+QEx+tirrd1TMtx00w8+pTKsVLJbNSZuW92x7BwifQf7FJ4HaydlceL51zgc 4iPjYyPJOI0IOaeC+hc1EZ4wVGYQFGvSYzgYfDR/D8P9Maf8ApBOoVWfqrOU/xSEGPW50R WRB4fXMfQ2HaxX3JI0oRFr/dz/Mz8z3ljCxgW+jkXE6XxsC+FUhtfTSsm9mhRUhhE4qWfP StILZ8r2UrSRCTS8LWRlDgXA/QbVEdv2sCYVQO+tO4AFHAC+Rvm3iG/01UrrdF9/2y4sdX d4w2HyU5QoPwZgti8fPIHZRY4t65F8+/8G2JokKbKpQootE2iGhggKIpjJ8TGw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1692695111; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Cq7pTojDTtQ/swUm2KHO2Nk8lPOT82djI/4VhrgDichSLLPo3FPDiw5sjxFNdEGAMfHoBP LJc2cqEdZsdumpj6nHcZAXb95otvvjGnFzxK5bzW72Tvd5AEgjRtMW0aTGMZermRHKYqK2 iPvo41kV4HtllOLW7j/DwLW7oXOsO3CUfj6na4lgI7SYXaZpHn9XdZgaLbGWEph154KaWU cbj7PbnA/0uATsa6jHUZ144nsD3UODckkP9GOidOpTP7VT9zzA1l6eKy8LbyECNhPED0Ne NCTMl3GP0/uRsmEBi/j1oGWYMKgRt2qU1iPfprMhq0ahTbfks8C/tqzCKFgU8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RVNj33vpgzxK9 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 37M95B4d009881 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:05:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 37M95BSI009880 for pkg@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:05:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 269810] ports-mgmt/pkg: how to restore pkg database Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:05:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: grahamperrin@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D269810 --- Comment #8 from Graham Perrin --- Back closer to topic, in an effort to avoid confusion: removal of from the See Also field of this bug report was not specific to this report. This one removal was, naturally, consequent to a broader request for (indiscriminate) closure of = all my PRs in that area.=20 ---- Back on topic, for readers who may be unfamiliar with features of GitHub:=20 .diff and .patch files do remain available, as shown below (their=20 URLs are disallowed for See Also purposes). =20=20=20=20=20 ---- Looking ahead, more generally: Bugmeister might like to advise whether it's appropriate to have the 'needs-patch' keyword in situations such as this, w= here a patch file is available but not directly attached. Reports with no non-obsolete patch attached can _not_ be found by queries such as this:=20 > all open reports with a non-obsolete patch, by assignee For readers to _not_ misconstrue needs-patch as no-patch, my instinct is to misuse the deprecated 'patch' keyword ;-) Yep, the one that I long ago batch-applied before the deprecated keyword was marked as such. Oops. Of course, I'll not apply it :-) This discussion can continue in private. No rush. Thanks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=