From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 20 04:24:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA28473 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 04:24:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA28468 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 04:24:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from algo.com.gr (olympus.algo.com.gr) by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA01754 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Wed, 20 Nov 1996 04:22:44 -0800 Received: from by algo.com.gr (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA10703; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 14:04:34 +0200 Received: from dennis.rtd.algo.com.gr by (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA07050; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 14:05:57 +0200 Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19961120120658.006f8ecc@kentauros> X-Sender: dennis@kentauros X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 14:06:58 +0200 To: questions@freebsd.org From: dennis Subject: question: Unite or Die? Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi to all, i posted a question recently, asking why to prefer FBSD over Linux. I was accused of starting a flame war then. My real intention was to see if there was *REALLY* something diffrent to look about. My conclusion is that in some fields FBSD is better (networking, stability) and in some other Linux has the lead( available drivers, memory managment). My question is why have two OS rather than one REALLY good one? Why dont programmers,hackers,develepors of both teams unite to write the ultimite OS? Why the two teams mock at each other? Dont they see the danger in front of them? Windows NT has only one goal: to kill UNIX and every flavour of it! Distribute your knowledge, before you become a close team of hackers against the rest of the NT driven world! thank you for your time -Dennis- Senior Software Engineer http://www.rtd.algo.com.gr/ home page of ALGOSYSTEMS S.A