Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:05:29 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel module path for ports? Message-ID: <200501261005.29685.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> In-Reply-To: <15CEC06D-129C-44A4-8B98-497C32D1E0E3@ahze.net> References: <20050126025125.GA44297@nowhere> <200501260932.57528.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> <15CEC06D-129C-44A4-8B98-497C32D1E0E3@ahze.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Mi=E9rcoles, 26 de Enero de 2005 09:42, Michael Johnson escribi=F3:
> On Jan 26, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > El Mi=E9rcoles, 26 de Enero de 2005 03:51, Craig Boston escribi=F3:
> >> I'm working on a port that needs to install a kernel module (loaded by
> >> an rcNG script). Is there a preferred location for kernel modules
> >> installed by a port?
> >>
> >> A quick search of Google, the Porter's Handbook, and hier(7) came up
> >> empty. The following locations seem to be popular:
> >>
> >> $PREFIX/lib/$PORTNAME
> >
> > better ${PREFIX}/libexec/...
> >
> >> $PREFIX/modules
> >
> > Not an option
>
> rtc installs kernel module here.
but it isn't a good place. You may also install doc under ${PREFIX}/doc, b=
ut=20
the correct place is ${PREFIX}/share/doc. Or, at last, the most common hier=
=20
to 3rd-party soft.
=2D-
josemi
>
>
> Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501261005.29685.josemi>