From owner-cvs-all Sun Aug 12 7:29:26 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3218D37B40B; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 07:29:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from rwatson@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7CETKK07916; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 07:29:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rwatson) Message-Id: <200108121429.f7CETKK07916@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Robert Watson Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 07:29:20 -0700 (PDT) To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs linprocfs_vnops.c src/sys/miscfs/procfs procfs.h procfs_mem.c procfs_vnops.c X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: RELENG_4 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG rwatson 2001/08/12 07:29:20 PDT Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) sys/i386/linux/linprocfs linprocfs_vnops.c sys/miscfs/procfs procfs.h procfs_mem.c procfs_vnops.c Log: MFC of procfs "kmem" cleanup. With the advent of an entirely sysctl-driven "ps" (and friends), special-casing of kmem gid in the procfs authorization is no longer needed. Clean up this morally ambiguous code. This MFC is from fs/procfs, as procfs has been repo-copied. Unlike -CURRENT, linprocfs required modification as in -STABLE, it has direct knowledge of the inter-process debugging authorization policy. In -CURRENT, this is abstracted behind p_cansignal(). procfs.h: 1.36, 1.37 procfs_mem.c: 1.53 procfs_subr.c: 1.35 procfs_vnops.c: 1.100, 1.101 Reviewed by: jedgar, tmm Approved by: re@FreeBSD.org Revision Changes Path 1.3.2.5 +2 -20 src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs/Attic/linprocfs_vnops.c 1.32.2.2 +1 -6 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/Attic/procfs.h 1.46.2.2 +2 -34 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/Attic/procfs_mem.c 1.76.2.5 +3 -9 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/Attic/procfs_vnops.c To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message